Best Known (62−28, 62, s)-Nets in Base 2
(62−28, 62, 28)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 62, 28)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 31, 14)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
(62−28, 62, 29)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (34, 62, 29)-net over F2, using
(62−28, 62, 106)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (34, 62, 107)-net over F2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(262, 107, F2, 28) (dual of [107, 45, 29]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(263, 108, F2, 29) (dual of [108, 45, 30]-code), but
(62−28, 62, 107)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 62, 108)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(262, 108, S2, 28), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2852 194618 252966 848277 066929 703881 801728 / 562 984193 820668 484375 > 262 [i]