Best Known (69−28, 69, s)-Nets in Base 2
(69−28, 69, 34)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 69, 34)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 72, 34)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 36, 17)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 16)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 16)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 36, 17)-net over F4, using
(69−28, 69, 40)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (41, 69, 40)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 70, 40)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 20)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 19)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 19)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 20)-net over F4, using
(69−28, 69, 164)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 69, 165)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 608 781942 798371 975968 > 269 [i]