Best Known (134−29, 134, s)-Nets in Base 2
(134−29, 134, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 134, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (104, 134, 195)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 135, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 45, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 45, 65)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 135, 195)-net over F2, using
(134−29, 134, 300)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (105, 134, 300)-net over F2, using
(134−29, 134, 4357)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 134, 4358)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 133, 4358)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10916 576523 392418 486400 742998 104413 741952 > 2133 [i]