Best Known (64−29, 64, s)-Nets in Base 2
(64−29, 64, 28)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 64, 28)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 32, 14)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
(64−29, 64, 29)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (35, 64, 29)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 28)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 35 and N(F) ≥ 29, using
(64−29, 64, 116)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 64, 117)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 63, 117)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(263, 117, S2, 28), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16946 634974 952621 699046 667146 230655 213597 884416 / 1729 294234 965439 779438 380995 > 263 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(263, 117, S2, 28), but