Best Known (114, 114+29, s)-Nets in Base 2
(114, 114+29, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (114, 143, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 144, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
(114, 114+29, 417)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (114, 143, 417)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2143, 417, F2, 2, 29) (dual of [(417, 2), 691, 30]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2143, 522, F2, 2, 29) (dual of [(522, 2), 901, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2143, 1044, F2, 29) (dual of [1044, 901, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2143, 1045, F2, 29) (dual of [1045, 902, 30]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1021,24]), C2 = C([0,26]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,24]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1021,26]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2131, 1023, F2, 27) (dual of [1023, 892, 28]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,24}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- linear OA(2131, 1023, F2, 27) (dual of [1023, 892, 28]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = [0,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- linear OA(2141, 1023, F2, 29) (dual of [1023, 882, 30]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,26}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
- linear OA(2121, 1023, F2, 25) (dual of [1023, 902, 26]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = [0,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(21, 11, F2, 1) (dual of [11, 10, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(21, 11, F2, 1) (dual of [11, 10, 2]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1021,24]), C2 = C([0,26]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,24]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1021,26]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2143, 1045, F2, 29) (dual of [1045, 902, 30]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2143, 1044, F2, 29) (dual of [1044, 901, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2143, 522, F2, 2, 29) (dual of [(522, 2), 901, 30]-NRT-code), using
(114, 114+29, 6814)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (114, 143, 6815)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (114, 142, 6815)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 576362 211709 049423 361677 957786 053268 084983 > 2142 [i]