Best Known (69−31, 69, s)-Nets in Base 2
(69−31, 69, 28)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 69, 28)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 70, 28)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 35, 14)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 35, 14)-net over F4, using
(69−31, 69, 31)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (38, 69, 31)-net over F2, using
(69−31, 69, 126)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 69, 127)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 68, 127)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(268, 127, S2, 30), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5956 789481 066977 461874 107947 023425 660998 525132 996608 / 18 525527 001375 563554 145376 517395 > 268 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(268, 127, S2, 30), but