Best Known (260−34, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−34, 260, 1928)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (226, 260, 1928)-net over F2, using
- 23 times duplication [i] based on digital (223, 257, 1928)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (222, 257, 1928)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2257, 1928, F2, 35, 35) (dual of [(1928, 35), 67223, 36]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 17-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2257, 32777, F2, 35) (dual of [32777, 32520, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2257, 32784, F2, 35) (dual of [32784, 32527, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(32) [i] based on
- linear OA(2256, 32768, F2, 35) (dual of [32768, 32512, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 215−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(2241, 32768, F2, 33) (dual of [32768, 32527, 34]-code), using an extension Ce(32) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 215−1, defining interval I = [1,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(21, 16, F2, 1) (dual of [16, 15, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(32) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2257, 32784, F2, 35) (dual of [32784, 32527, 36]-code), using
- OOA 17-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2257, 32777, F2, 35) (dual of [32777, 32520, 36]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2257, 1928, F2, 35, 35) (dual of [(1928, 35), 67223, 36]-NRT-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (222, 257, 1928)-net over F2, using
(260−34, 260, 6190)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (226, 260, 6190)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2260, 6190, F2, 5, 34) (dual of [(6190, 5), 30690, 35]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2260, 6557, F2, 5, 34) (dual of [(6557, 5), 32525, 35]-NRT-code), using
- 22 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(2258, 6557, F2, 5, 34) (dual of [(6557, 5), 32527, 35]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 5-folding [i] based on linear OA(2258, 32785, F2, 34) (dual of [32785, 32527, 35]-code), using
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(2256, 32783, F2, 34) (dual of [32783, 32527, 35]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2257, 32784, F2, 35) (dual of [32784, 32527, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(32) [i] based on
- linear OA(2256, 32768, F2, 35) (dual of [32768, 32512, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 215−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(2241, 32768, F2, 33) (dual of [32768, 32527, 34]-code), using an extension Ce(32) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 215−1, defining interval I = [1,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(21, 16, F2, 1) (dual of [16, 15, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(32) [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2257, 32784, F2, 35) (dual of [32784, 32527, 36]-code), using
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(2256, 32783, F2, 34) (dual of [32783, 32527, 35]-code), using
- OOA 5-folding [i] based on linear OA(2258, 32785, F2, 34) (dual of [32785, 32527, 35]-code), using
- 22 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(2258, 6557, F2, 5, 34) (dual of [(6557, 5), 32527, 35]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2260, 6557, F2, 5, 34) (dual of [(6557, 5), 32525, 35]-NRT-code), using
(260−34, 260, 288333)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (226, 260, 288334)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 852683 111458 243880 953187 801022 766113 529674 778854 047128 623782 781968 143132 566940 > 2260 [i]