Best Known (91−36, 91, s)-Nets in Base 2
(91−36, 91, 44)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 91, 44)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 92, 44)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 46, 22)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 22, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 46, 22)-net over F4, using
(91−36, 91, 52)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (55, 91, 52)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 92, 52)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 46, 26)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 46, 26)-net over F4, using
(91−36, 91, 225)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 91, 226)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2495 181584 074921 595103 387104 > 291 [i]