Best Known (127, 127+36, s)-Nets in Base 2
(127, 127+36, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (127, 163, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (126, 163, 195)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 168, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 56, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 56, 65)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 168, 195)-net over F2, using
(127, 127+36, 329)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (127, 163, 329)-net over F2, using
(127, 127+36, 3992)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (127, 163, 3993)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11 711205 027150 675134 204078 353752 047589 359224 153024 > 2163 [i]