Best Known (156, 156+37, s)-Nets in Base 2
(156, 156+37, 267)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (156, 193, 267)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 21, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (135, 172, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (3, 21, 7)-net over F2, using
(156, 156+37, 579)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (156, 193, 579)-net over F2, using
(156, 156+37, 12251)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (156, 193, 12252)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (156, 192, 12252)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6284 317200 472119 537954 209991 559422 349119 049717 416564 933565 > 2192 [i]