Best Known (145, 145+38, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145, 145+38, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 183, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (144, 183, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 184, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 184, 260)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+38, 432)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 183, 432)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+38, 6261)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 183, 6262)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 279858 891100 323362 116067 090829 066793 080155 801421 372374 > 2183 [i]