Best Known (135, 135+39, s)-Nets in Base 2
(135, 135+39, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 174, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (134, 174, 195)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 180, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 60, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 60, 65)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 180, 195)-net over F2, using
(135, 135+39, 333)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (135, 174, 333)-net over F2, using
(135, 135+39, 4338)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 174, 4339)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 173, 4339)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11973 803454 109370 719808 924284 044408 862191 876416 382386 > 2173 [i]