Best Known (158, 158+39, s)-Nets in Base 2
(158, 158+39, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 197, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (156, 197, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (156, 200, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (156, 200, 260)-net over F2, using
(158, 158+39, 531)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (158, 197, 531)-net over F2, using
(158, 158+39, 10077)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 197, 10078)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (158, 196, 10078)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 100434 556387 947366 690956 324176 820107 942031 922154 554766 793882 > 2196 [i]