Best Known (161, 161+40, s)-Nets in Base 2
(161, 161+40, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 201, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (159, 201, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
(161, 161+40, 530)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (161, 201, 530)-net over F2, using
(161, 161+40, 8774)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 201, 8775)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 220512 463865 397168 030304 362390 757318 906651 924143 780888 834196 > 2201 [i]