Best Known (163−41, 163, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163−41, 163, 144)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (122, 163, 144)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (121, 163, 144)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (121, 165, 144)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 55, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 55, 48)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (121, 165, 144)-net over F2, using
(163−41, 163, 234)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (122, 163, 234)-net over F2, using
(163−41, 163, 2249)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (122, 163, 2250)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (122, 162, 2250)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 888561 167396 974394 156828 616011 028605 449681 209176 > 2162 [i]