Best Known (217−41, 217, s)-Nets in Base 2
(217−41, 217, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 217, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 29, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (147, 188, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 47, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 47, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 29, 12)-net over F2, using
(217−41, 217, 666)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (176, 217, 666)-net over F2, using
(217−41, 217, 14776)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 217, 14777)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 216, 14777)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105416 333410 934626 593563 758333 685605 309707 860588 249470 622776 927046 > 2216 [i]