Best Known (88−41, 88, s)-Nets in Base 2
(88−41, 88, 34)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 88, 34)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 88, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
(88−41, 88, 36)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (47, 88, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 47 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
(88−41, 88, 122)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 88, 123)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 87, 123)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(287, 123, S2, 40), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 141915 544627 775652 370333 355984 551936 / 832 136179 > 287 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(287, 123, S2, 40), but