Best Known (146, 146+41, s)-Nets in Base 2
(146, 146+41, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 187, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 22, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (124, 165, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 55, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 55, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 22, 6)-net over F2, using
(146, 146+41, 375)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 187, 375)-net over F2, using
(146, 146+41, 5205)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 187, 5206)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 186, 5206)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 98 381488 085033 895884 408783 293697 344304 346546 317400 430033 > 2186 [i]