Best Known (202−42, 202, s)-Nets in Base 2
(202−42, 202, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 202, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (159, 202, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
(202−42, 202, 466)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 202, 466)-net over F2, using
(202−42, 202, 6794)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 202, 6795)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 442619 461022 604702 476051 668791 207088 311547 494485 947424 909312 > 2202 [i]