Best Known (209−42, 209, s)-Nets in Base 2
(209−42, 209, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (167, 209, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (165, 209, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
(209−42, 209, 531)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (167, 209, 531)-net over F2, using
(209−42, 209, 8568)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (167, 209, 8569)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 824 270251 475327 031499 364779 121414 631476 686831 717153 797489 897220 > 2209 [i]