Best Known (143, 143+43, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 143+43, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 186, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (142, 186, 195)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
(143, 143+43, 323)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 186, 323)-net over F2, using
(143, 143+43, 3863)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 186, 3864)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 185, 3864)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 49 209674 661912 556968 492064 788490 045153 496525 894238 505235 > 2185 [i]