Best Known (150, 150+43, s)-Nets in Base 2
(150, 150+43, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (150, 193, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 22, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (128, 171, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 57, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 57, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 22, 5)-net over F2, using
(150, 150+43, 368)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (150, 193, 368)-net over F2, using
(150, 150+43, 4875)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (150, 193, 4876)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (150, 192, 4876)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6289 670402 761039 251775 700689 843808 067446 770654 586321 867552 > 2192 [i]