Best Known (170, 170+43, s)-Nets in Base 2
(170, 170+43, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (170, 213, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (168, 213, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+43, 532)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (170, 213, 532)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+43, 9463)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (170, 213, 9464)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (170, 212, 9464)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6591 832769 410925 054935 837212 406533 300281 467084 209020 839019 775585 > 2212 [i]