Best Known (210−44, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−44, 210, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 210, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (165, 210, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
(210−44, 210, 470)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 210, 470)-net over F2, using
(210−44, 210, 6733)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 210, 6734)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1648 705078 164192 365747 996227 727917 523345 086594 778871 726009 937872 > 2210 [i]