Best Known (173, 173+44, s)-Nets in Base 2
(173, 173+44, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (173, 217, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (171, 217, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+44, 533)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (173, 217, 533)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+44, 8402)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (173, 217, 8403)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 210672 123236 130596 727417 013126 346398 552905 186880 031237 122979 908128 > 2217 [i]