Best Known (190, 190+44, s)-Nets in Base 2
(190, 190+44, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 234, 274)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (189, 233, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 33, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 200, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 33, 14)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(190, 190+44, 719)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (190, 234, 719)-net over F2, using
(190, 190+44, 14379)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 234, 14380)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27636 071481 532649 243633 079697 714077 681424 670900 613431 860372 759665 881956 > 2234 [i]