Best Known (196−45, 196, s)-Nets in Base 2
(196−45, 196, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (151, 196, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (150, 196, 195)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (150, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 68, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 68, 65)-net over F8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (150, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
(196−45, 196, 344)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (151, 196, 344)-net over F2, using
(196−45, 196, 4185)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (151, 196, 4186)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (151, 195, 4186)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 50402 594049 839752 112851 580762 054205 174051 099243 963745 898236 > 2195 [i]