Best Known (227−45, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(227−45, 227, 265)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 227, 265)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 23, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 23, 5)-net over F2, using
(227−45, 227, 593)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 227, 593)-net over F2, using
(227−45, 227, 11168)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 227, 11169)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 226, 11169)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107 962464 100774 074963 099195 474770 032029 254396 962785 257832 666549 075728 > 2226 [i]