Best Known (231−45, 231, s)-Nets in Base 2
(231−45, 231, 269)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (186, 231, 269)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 27, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (5, 27, 9)-net over F2, using
(231−45, 231, 635)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (186, 231, 635)-net over F2, using
(231−45, 231, 12672)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (186, 231, 12673)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (186, 230, 12673)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1725 931863 779315 863946 491008 348717 173043 559698 094565 689979 956426 111808 > 2230 [i]