Best Known (233−45, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2
(233−45, 233, 270)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (188, 233, 270)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (187, 232, 270)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(233−45, 233, 657)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (188, 233, 657)-net over F2, using
(233−45, 233, 13499)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (188, 233, 13500)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (188, 232, 13500)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6910 748300 045379 741907 967950 324926 125603 907403 911815 407351 247603 006926 > 2232 [i]