MinT - Best Known (101, 101+45, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (101, 101+45, s)-Nets in Base 2

(101, 101+45, 74)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (101, 146, 74)-net over F₂, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (4, 26, 8)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence (PirÅ¡iÄ‡ implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
2. digital (75, 120, 66)-net over F₂, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 60, 33)-net over F₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(101, 101+45, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive

(101, 146, 84)-net in base 2, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (101, 148, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 74, 42)-net in base 4, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
    - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(101, 101+45, 130)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (101, 146, 130)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(101, 101+45, 840)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (101, 146, 841)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 145, 841)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 44 781903 405938 253030 743906 393396 840270 834928 > 2¹⁴⁵ [i]