Best Known (104, 104+45, s)-Nets in Base 2
(104, 104+45, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 149, 76)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (103, 148, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (75, 120, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 60, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 60, 33)-net over F4, using
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(104, 104+45, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(104, 149, 84)-net in base 2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (104, 154, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 77, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 77, 42)-net in base 4, using
(104, 104+45, 138)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 149, 138)-net over F2, using
(104, 104+45, 927)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 149, 928)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 148, 928)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 362 472559 455426 934664 599588 563418 935262 638083 > 2148 [i]