Best Known (105, 105+45, s)-Nets in Base 2
(105, 105+45, 84)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 150, 84)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 50, 28)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
(105, 105+45, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(105, 150, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 75, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
(105, 105+45, 141)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (105, 150, 141)-net over F2, using
(105, 105+45, 958)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 150, 959)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 149, 959)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 729 578330 032224 129921 858748 191570 747580 831167 > 2149 [i]