Best Known (185, 185+45, s)-Nets in Base 2
(185, 185+45, 268)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (185, 230, 268)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 26, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (4, 26, 8)-net over F2, using
(185, 185+45, 624)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (185, 230, 624)-net over F2, using
(185, 185+45, 12278)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (185, 230, 12279)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (185, 229, 12279)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 863 066760 765841 125324 644846 281284 896933 038332 607080 252735 303386 768639 > 2229 [i]