Best Known (194, 194+45, s)-Nets in Base 2
(194, 194+45, 275)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (194, 239, 275)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 35, 15)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 14)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 15, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 14)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (13, 35, 15)-net over F2, using
(194, 194+45, 729)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (194, 239, 729)-net over F2, using
(194, 194+45, 16314)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (194, 239, 16315)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (194, 238, 16315)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 441718 718325 855662 239802 389405 101764 086040 763952 954526 003925 258962 959994 > 2238 [i]