Best Known (86, 86+45, s)-Nets in Base 2
(86, 86+45, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 131, 66)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 142, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
(86, 86+45, 92)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 131, 92)-net over F2, using
(86, 86+45, 512)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 131, 513)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 130, 513)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1392 250576 663000 496546 555994 545074 546432 > 2130 [i]