Best Known (204−47, 204, s)-Nets in Base 2
(204−47, 204, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (157, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (156, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
(204−47, 204, 353)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (157, 204, 353)-net over F2, using
(204−47, 204, 4245)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (157, 204, 4246)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (157, 203, 4246)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 895128 630650 319561 426107 514568 130689 087755 358803 159856 215148 > 2203 [i]