Best Known (235−47, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(235−47, 235, 263)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (188, 235, 263)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 23, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 23, 3)-net over F2, using
(235−47, 235, 593)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (188, 235, 593)-net over F2, using
(235−47, 235, 10858)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (188, 235, 10859)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (188, 234, 10859)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27660 102732 230130 969675 937822 694413 890864 698836 021622 072463 853274 330184 > 2234 [i]