Best Known (170, 170+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(170, 170+47, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (170, 217, 260)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (169, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+47, 439)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (170, 217, 439)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+47, 6297)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (170, 217, 6298)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (170, 216, 6298)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105393 853848 014121 556834 891614 982508 157044 785906 219685 102024 266828 > 2216 [i]