Best Known (176, 176+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(176, 176+47, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 223, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (174, 223, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (174, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 56, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 56, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (174, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
(176, 176+47, 486)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (176, 223, 486)-net over F2, using
(176, 176+47, 7552)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 223, 7553)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 222, 7553)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 745686 012039 067831 026590 031850 042154 560458 460628 311528 657862 545408 > 2222 [i]