Best Known (192, 192+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(192, 192+47, 268)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (192, 239, 268)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 27, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (4, 27, 8)-net over F2, using
(192, 192+47, 634)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (192, 239, 634)-net over F2, using
(192, 192+47, 12253)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (192, 239, 12254)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (192, 238, 12254)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 442118 167647 627833 576182 519027 014358 353357 404374 177653 325680 265860 553248 > 2238 [i]