Best Known (197, 197+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(197, 197+47, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (197, 244, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 32, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 32, 12)-net over F2, using
(197, 197+47, 688)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (197, 244, 688)-net over F2, using
(197, 197+47, 14251)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (197, 244, 14252)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (197, 243, 14252)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 139192 880956 159928 865914 070713 155439 950187 618485 069927 033057 854921 132100 > 2243 [i]