Best Known (199, 199+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(199, 199+47, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (199, 246, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
(199, 199+47, 711)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (199, 246, 711)-net over F2, using
(199, 199+47, 15139)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (199, 246, 15140)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (199, 245, 15140)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 595842 549789 378475 572245 228896 452954 265857 543955 014925 671040 403804 185544 > 2245 [i]