Best Known (200, 200+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200, 200+47, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (200, 247, 274)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (199, 246, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(200, 200+47, 723)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (200, 247, 723)-net over F2, using
(200, 200+47, 15603)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (200, 247, 15604)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (200, 246, 15604)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 113 149290 413820 157825 860026 892431 942277 462859 537764 743392 830058 100955 594568 > 2246 [i]