MinT - Best Known (99, 99+47, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (99, 99+47, s)-Nets in Base 2

Digital (99, 146, 68)-net over F₂, using

10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (99, 156, 68)-net over F₂, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 78, 34)-net over F₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
      - T₅ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(99, 146, 72)-net in base 2, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 73, 36)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (26, 35)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (52, 35)-sequence over F₂, using
    - t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 41, N(F)Â =Â 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

Digital (99, 146, 117)-net over F₂, using

There is no (99, 146, 712)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 145, 712)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 44 797502 349824 699086 957342 841590 457037 832540 > 2¹⁴⁵ [i]