Best Known (229−48, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−48, 229, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 229, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 229, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
(229−48, 229, 505)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 229, 505)-net over F2, using
(229−48, 229, 7270)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 229, 7271)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 863 391017 143680 040572 878180 948559 507353 287542 301729 519021 856119 263436 > 2229 [i]