Best Known (215−49, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(215−49, 215, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 215, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 26, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (140, 189, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 26, 6)-net over F2, using
(215−49, 215, 379)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 215, 379)-net over F2, using
(215−49, 215, 4702)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 215, 4703)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (166, 214, 4703)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26449 007178 393633 191327 216195 311563 061384 646048 044302 985668 619499 > 2214 [i]