Best Known (217−49, 217, s)-Nets in Base 2
(217−49, 217, 203)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 217, 203)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 28, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (140, 189, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (4, 28, 8)-net over F2, using
(217−49, 217, 392)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 217, 392)-net over F2, using
(217−49, 217, 4983)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 217, 4984)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (168, 216, 4984)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105416 369040 981132 839371 876181 121046 137749 722028 003201 366562 296876 > 2216 [i]