Best Known (229−49, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−49, 229, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (180, 229, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
(229−49, 229, 476)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (180, 229, 476)-net over F2, using
(229−49, 229, 7062)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (180, 229, 7063)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (180, 228, 7063)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 431 691622 941521 544944 675806 615363 543997 066655 093735 764510 941673 371136 > 2228 [i]