Best Known (246−49, 246, s)-Nets in Base 2
(246−49, 246, 266)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (197, 246, 266)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 26, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (2, 26, 6)-net over F2, using
(246−49, 246, 624)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (197, 246, 624)-net over F2, using
(246−49, 246, 11562)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (197, 246, 11563)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (197, 245, 11563)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 610061 771815 303959 594499 227262 098736 502692 855957 806427 513300 163772 570986 > 2245 [i]